<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Upstairs Communications Ltd &#187; reputation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upstairs.org.uk/tag/reputation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upstairs.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 11:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internal communication is vital but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2009/03/internal-communication-is-vital-but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2009/03/internal-communication-is-vital-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosie Fyles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upstairs.org.uk/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organisations seem to be facing the same challenges at the same time in internal communication right now: is it best to talk about what you (top level management) have decided and know now &#8211; or wait &#8211; until concensus is reached on communication? Agremeent is being sought not just on what is said, but on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organisations seem to be facing the same challenges at the same time in internal communication right now: is it best to talk about what you (top level management) have decided and know now &#8211; or wait &#8211; until concensus is reached on communication? Agremeent is being sought not just on what is said, but on how it&#8217;s said, when it&#8217;s said, how many times it&#8217;s said, who says it, what languages it&#8217;s said in..we could go on.</p>
<p>While this process escalates &#8211; and is repeated, probably &#8211; employees (not top level management) will have their own assumptions about what is happening, some will have already picked up on aspects of what is happening too. Theories about what is about to be done (to them, not with them or by them) will be discussed and engagement, productivity and time will inevitably be lost. Such delays &#8211; or perceived silences &#8211; often attack trust. And while internal communication is rightly at the top of the senior management agenda, this focus is not actually getting the job done.</p>
<p>Times have changed &#8211; the right people are discussing how to communicate and realising the importance of communication within the organisation.  It&#8217;s just that in some cases, it&#8217;s not these people that are doing the communicating, they&#8217;re talking about doing it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2009/03/internal-communication-is-vital-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No.1 in internal communication</title>
		<link>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/no1-in-internal-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/no1-in-internal-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosie Fyles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face to face communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal brand managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workshops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upstairs.org.uk/wordpress/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were asked by a client to speak at an internal communication workshop for 21 communications managers held in Hong Kong last week. With an eye on our carbon footprint &#8211; and our client&#8217;s 2 eyes on budget &#8211; we had the pleasure of presenting to the group via a fantastic video conferencing suite. Our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were asked by a client to speak at an internal communication workshop for 21 communications managers held in Hong Kong last week. With an eye on our carbon footprint &#8211; and our client&#8217;s 2 eyes on budget &#8211; we had the pleasure of presenting to the group via a fantastic video conferencing suite. Our enjoyment of the technology and attention to detail of the facility were marred only slightly by our attendance at 5.30am&#8230;</p>
<p>Our topic &#8216;New frontiers in internal communication&#8217; was an interesting one&#8230; We looked at lots of internal communications tools that were growing in usefulness and prominence (the role of web 2.0 internally, wikis, podcasts, every picture telling a story, feedback, feedback and more feedback) and also talked about the key drivers in employee engagement. Take a look at the presentation which is packed full of budget-proof statistics that prove internal communication matters. And what large conclusions global surveys of communication professionals drew.</p>
<h3>What were our conclusions?</h3>
<p><span id="more-242"></span>Leadership communication is the number 1 in internal engagement. Formal media are weak in impact compared to the words and actions &#8211; informal and formal &#8211; of the people at the top. Our leaders are judged on how they communicate, their reputation is vital and face to face is where they really make the most impact&#8230;</p>
<p>The future for internal communications is an interesting one &#8211; we&#8217;ll be &#8216;holding the space&#8217; for the communication tools that allow unfettered interactivity. And we&#8217;ll be the personal brand managers of the leaders that count.</p>
<p>Are there really &#8216;new frontiers&#8217;? Probably not. The tools are different and we have more choice in what we use and how we use it. However, the business imperative and proving the business benefit are still &#8211; and always will be &#8211; the keys. There is nothing new there.</p>
<p><a href="http://upstairs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/newfrontiersinic.ppt">New Frontiers presentation (PowerPoint)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/no1-in-internal-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 degrees of bringing home the bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/7-degrees-of-bringing-home-the-bacon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/7-degrees-of-bringing-home-the-bacon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosie Fyles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upstairs.org.uk/wordpress/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was talking to an old university friend about a potential new client last night and asking her opinion of what I could explain to her about them so far &#8211; what do they do? It&#8217;s an often repeated question. She asked me how Upstairs had been introduced to them. I explained that the chain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to an old university friend about a potential new client last night and asking her opinion of what I could explain to her about them so far &#8211; what <strong>do</strong> they do? It&#8217;s an often repeated question.</p>
<p>She asked me how Upstairs had been introduced to them. I explained that the chain of recommendation had started with one client 8 years ago (2000, previous life) who had got in touch in the early days of Upstairs (2004) recommended us to his old colleague who had talked to us about one project that never happened in 2006 and then, she had remembered us last year (2007) and we are working for her and her team now (2008) and she talked about us to her old client who is now going to be working with us (to come) &#8230; I&#8217;m sure my friend wished she hadn&#8217;t asked.</p>
<p><span id="more-45"></span></p>
<p>This &#8216;chain of recommendation&#8217; got me thinking about a number of things &#8211; how old I am (narcissism, immediately). Also, the importance of reputation in everything we &#8211; who need to work for a living &#8211; do.Â  In fact, how actually these &#8216;champions&#8217; of our business have moulded what we do and without them, well, we&#8217;d be smaller, anxious, spending &#8216;working&#8217; time talking about hot, warm, cold and frankly vanishing act contacts and that really, they should be <em>recognised</em>. We do make sure &#8216;you&#8217; (blog readers each and every one we are sure&#8230;) are thanked, or try to&#8230; So, just after our fifth birthday, we have worked out a simple way of naming each and every one of &#8216;you&#8217; while minimising the risk of really upsetting those we don&#8217;t remember to name &#8211; see our &#8216;Supporters&#8217; section in About.</p>
<p>The bizarre, <em>polite</em> version of the &#8216;chain-game&#8217; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees_of_Kevin_Bacon" target="_blank">6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon</a> can then be played across, around and up and down our &#8216;we&#8217;re glad you thought of us&#8217; list&#8230;and we would be surprised if any chain actually gets to 6&#8230;that might take another 5 years. By which time we&#8217;ll all be tired and ancient.</p>
<p>More, on what our (confirmed, now) new client really does too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstairs.org.uk/2008/08/7-degrees-of-bringing-home-the-bacon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

